====== imprecise precision: using grids for polygons ====== Grids can be used to embody exactness of mathematical artifacts without having the precision of pencil and ruler skills--concepts of precise lines without reality of line widths or sloppiness getting in the way. ===== Sacrificing Regularity ===== Here are some examples of polygons where only the square is regular. ^ concept ^ description ^ details ^ ^ precision | Using grid points to create polygons. These examples contain angled lines with small integer (1 or 2) x & y components. A focus could be on developing descriptions of non-horizontal and non-vertical lines as. "so many up (down) so many right (left)." | {{:poly1.svg?400x400|}} | ^ midway points | To make better use of grids, midway points can be used to either simply make smaller polygons or debatably improve upon the regularness of polygons | {{:poly2a.svg?400x400|}} | ^ simple spirals | Use grid polygons to make spirals. The angled lines help to ensure lines of the spirals' lines remain parallel. Each of the straight lines lengths is a multiple of the original polygon's side. There is a pattern to the multipliers of the originals. For the triangle, the multipliers follow this sequence: 1, **2**, 3, 4, **5**, 6,... The multipliers 2 and 5 (bold in the sequence) are two and five times the original horizontal side not to be confused with the lengths of the sides 4 and 10. Similarly, the diagonal sides are some multiple of root 2 but since they have no additional grid points, it is easier to see the size of the multipliers. For the square, there is no such confusion; the multipliers follow this sequence: 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 4, 4, 5,... | {{:spiralTri0.svg}} | ^ ::: | ::: | {{:spiralS0.svg|400x300}} | ^ tricky spirals | What are the sequences of multipliers for these spirals? || ^ ::: | {{:spiralHex0.svg|400x300}} | {{:spiralPent0.svg|400x300}} | ^ ::: | {{:spiralHex2.svg|400x300}} | {{:spiralHex1.svg|400x300}} | ===== Spiral Connections ===== {{ :spirals0.svg?400x300|square spiral}} One tool to understand patterns is to construct a table that breaks up the information. Below I have constructed a table with the length of each segment starting from the center of the spiral. As well, a running total length is calculated. ^ length per side ^ total length | | 1 | **1** | | 1 | 2 | | 2 | **4** | | 2 | 6 | | 3 | **9** | | 3 | 12 | | 4 | **16** | | 4 | 20 | | 5 | **25** | | 5 | 30 | | 6 | **36** | | 6 | 42 | | 7 | **49** | | 7 | 56 | | 8 | **64** | | 8 | 72 | | 9 | **81** | A pattern in the total length can be seen. There are a number of ways to think about why this arises. For instance, each unit line segment in the spiral can be associated with a single dot in the grid which can in turn be associated with the square up and to its left. Total length becomes equivalent to area of a rectangle (which half the time is a square). In a related way, the sequence of total lengths can be shown zig-zagging down the times table. Since the sequence of square numbers are so useful, it's probably a good idea to highlight them. In this sequence, you may recognize that each square can be seen as a sum of consecutive odd numbers. ^ X ^ 1 ^ 2 ^ 3 ^ 4 ^ 5 ^ 6 ^ 7 ^ 8 ^ 9 | ^ 1 ^ //**1**// | //**2**// | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | ^ 2 | 2 ^ //**4**// | //**6**// | 8 | 10 | 12 | 14 | 16 | 18 | ^ 3 | 3 | 6 ^ //**9**// | //**12**// | 15 | 18 | 21 | 24 | 27 | ^ 4 | 4 | 8 | 12 ^ //**16**// | //**20**// | 24 | 28 | 32 | 36 | ^ 5 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 ^ //**25**// | //**30**// | 35 | 40 | 45 | ^ 6 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 24 | 30 ^ //**36**// | //**42**// | 48 | 54 | ^ 7 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 28 | 35 | 42 ^ //**49**// | //**56**// | 63 | ^ 8 | 8 | 16 | 24 | 32 | 40 | 48 | 56 ^ //**64**// | //**72**// | ^ 9 | 9 | 18 | 27 | 36 | 45 | 54 | 63 | 72 ^ //**81**// | ==== stepping through a triangular spiral ==== {{ :spiraltri0.svg?400x300|triangular spiral}} The triangular spiral to the right needs a little twist to better understand its pattern. Previously, the idea of multipliers was discussed as a means of talking about the lengths of line segments. Here, I would like to replace the term multiplier by using the idea of //step//s. To describe the original triangle we would say, 3 steps: one DR (Down & Right), one L (Left), one UR (Up&Right). Even though the steps are different lengths, we will consider them the same unit. This imprecision is to overcome the problem of not using a triangular grid. ^ # steps per side ^ total # steps | | 1 | 1 | | 2 | 3 | | 3 | 6 | | 4 | 10 | | 5 | 15 | | 6 | 21 | | 7 | 28 | | 8 | 36 | | 9 | 45 | Here the path the sequence of total # steps has a bit of a jumping zigzag. ^ X ^ 1 ^ 2 ^ 3 ^ 4 ^ 5 ^ 6 ^ 7 ^ 8 ^ 9 | ^ 1 | //**1**// | 2 | //**3**// | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | ^ 2 | 2 | 4 | //**6**// | 8 | //**10**// | 12 | 14 | 16 | 18 | ^ 3 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | //**15**// | 18 | //**21**// | 24 | 27 | ^ 4 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 16 | 20 | 24 | //**28**// | 32 | //**36**// | ^ 5 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 30 | 35 | 40 | //**45**// | ^ 6 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 24 | 30 | 36 | 42 | 48 | 54 | ^ 7 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 28 | 35 | 42 | 49 | 56 | 63 | ^ 8 | 8 | 16 | 24 | 32 | 40 | 48 | 56 | 64 | 72 | ^ 9 | 9 | 18 | 27 | 36 | 45 | 54 | 63 | 72 | 81 |